79 Wash. App. 144 - State v. Danner’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 118 Wash. 2d 801 - Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley · 119 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Johnson · 109 Wash. 2d 467 - Dennis v. Department of Labor & Industries · 116 Wash. 2d 794 - Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle · 118 Wash. 2d 551 - State v. Elgin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“RCW 46.20.342 describes the penalties [for DWLS 1 offenders], while RCW 46.65.070 and RCW 46.65.100 are concerned with the procedures for reinstatement. There is not, however, language harmonizing the three statutes for situations such as here,. . . where the period of suspension has run, but the driver has not taken the steps necessary to have his or her driver's license reinstated.[ [24] ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.