79 Wash. App. 670 - State v. Knight’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2021
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. White · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · Bornstein v. United States · 120 Wash. 2d 246 - Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co. · Kelley v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An authorization under this section is valid in all jurisdictions within Washington state and for the interception of communications from additional persons if the persons are brought into the conversation or transaction by the nonconsenting party or if the nonconsenting party or such additional persons cause or invite the consenting party to enter another jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the chief law enforcement officer of a law enforcement agency or his or her designee above the rank of first line supervisor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barron“an authorization to intercept and record is invalid outside the jurisdiction of the issuing supervisor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.