Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 A2D 368 - Nassa v. Hook-SupeRx, Inc.

Nassa v. Hook-SupeRx, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
6
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction (2008), Dwyer v. Commissioner of Correction (2002)

1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

180200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foley v. Polaroid Corp. · Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc. · Henry v. Cherry Webb · Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc. · Matter of Falstaff Brewing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he scope of the exclusive-remedy doctrine as embodied in workers' compensation law depends upon whether the alleged work-related injury is one for which the applicable workers' compensation statute provides a compensation remedy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The right to compensation for an injury under chapters 29-38 of this title, and the remedy for an injury granted by those chapters, shall be in lieu of all rights and remedies as to that injury now existing, either at common law or otherwise against an employer, or its directors, officers, agents, or employees * * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The elements of a cause of action for defamation are: (1) the utterance of a false and defamatory statement concerning another; (2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; (3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and (4) damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.