Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 F.2d 1050 - Kashi v. Gratsos

Kashi v. Gratsos’s Empirical Analysis

790 F.2d 1050 · 1986

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co. (1988), Cofacredit, S.A. v. Windsor Plumbing Supply Co. (1999)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

31019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. Kordel · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries Inc Securities and Exchange Commission · Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(a) a corrupt agreement between two or more persons, (b) an overt act in furtherance of the agreement, (c) the parties' intentional participation in the furtherance of a plan or purpose, and (d) the resulting damage or injury.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Constitution ... does not ordinarily require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings. ... Nevertheless, a court may decide in its discretion to stay civil proceedings ... when the interests of justice seem to require such action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1. a corrupt agreement between two or more parties; 2. an overt act in furtherance of the agreement; 3. the parties intentional participation in the furtherance of the plan or purpose; and 4. the resulting damage or injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.