Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 F.2d 1232 - Evans v. McCotter

Evans v. McCotter’s Empirical Analysis

790 F.2d 1232 · 1986

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2013 · most notably State v. Treesh (2001), Dawson v. Delaware (1992)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

1801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is settled that the death penalty may, as a general rule, be imposed on individuals for capital murder who themselves killed, attempted to kill, or intended that a killing take place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “cross-examination must be permitted into any incentive the witness may have to falsify his testimony,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.