United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
790 F.2d 13 · 1986
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Sangineto-Miranda (1988), United States v. Figueroa (1987)
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the sale and arrests took place immediately outside the ... apartment, the agents could reasonably believe that the failure of [the arrested cohorts] to return to the apartment promptly with the money could create a substantial risk that appellant would flee or destroy evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“was sufficient to support the agents' belief that [the dealer's] supplier and other evidence would be found in apartment 15.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.