Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

790 F.2d 1486

Docket No. 85-2296.

Sharma v. Stevas

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 5, 1986*. Decided June 9, 1986.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-06-09

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. · Arizona v. Manypenny · Olberding v. Illinois Central Railroad

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-06-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Mullis v. United Statescy Court for District of Nevada, Moore v. Brewster (1996)

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mahendra Rudra Sharma, in pro. per.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.

Before WALLACE, HUG, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The judgment of the district court dismissing Sharma's Federal Tort Claims Act action with prejudice is affirmed. The defendant Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has absolute quasi-judicial immunity because his challenged activities were an integral part of the judicial process. Morrison v. Jones, 607 F.2d 1269, 1273 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 962, 100 S.Ct. 1648, 64 L.Ed.2d 237 (1980).

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 3(f)

/790/f2d/1486 · .json · Public domain