Woodmore v. Git-N-Go’s Empirical Analysis
790 F.2d 1497 · 1986
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2009
12 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc. · Shelter Products Company v. Forest Products Company · Hollis v. United States · Stanley v. Continental Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“default appears to be that of the attorney ... a trial court must explain why it imposed the extreme sanction of dismissal”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the fault lies with the attorneys, that is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.