Rodriguez v. Banco Central’s Empirical Analysis
790 F.2d 172 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Fleet Data Processing Corp. v. Branch (In Re Bank of New England Corp.) (1998), In re El San Juan Hotel (1987)
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1701 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should be the 'central focus' and perhaps even the 'dispositive criterion' of appellate jurisdiction over [interlocutory] orders.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The order must involve: (1) an issue essentially unrelated to the merits of the main dispute, capable of review without disrupting the main trial; (2) a complete resolution of the issue, not one that is “unfinished” or “inconclusive”; (3) a right incapable of vindication on appeal from final judgment; and (4) an important and unsettled question of controlling law, not merely a question of the proper exercise of the trial court’s discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“turns on whether irreparable harm would result to appellants, not from the district court's order itself, but from a delay in obtaining appellate review of that order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.