Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 F.2d 562 - Carson v. Block

Carson v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

790 F.2d 562 · 1986

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
April 2003
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably Archie v. City of Racine (1988), Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc. (1986)

37 federal appellate · 1 district ·

350198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1981A

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Paul v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Similarly, a federal court will not require a state to follow its own law, even though adherence to governing rules is an important ingredient in both due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]n interest is 'property' only if there is an entitlement that stands or falls on the application of rules to facts. 'To the extent a request appeals to discretion rather than to rules, there is no property.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he essence of a 'collateral' order is the absence of a final judgment on a separate document.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.