Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 F.2d 576 - United States v. Windfelder

United States v. Windfelder’s Empirical Analysis

790 F.2d 576 · 1986

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Douglas (1987), United States v. Kinsey (1988)

56 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

3501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Barrett v. United States · United States v. West · Torres v. County of Oakland · United States v. Gold · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Similarly, ... an IRS expert's analysis of the transaction itself, which necessarily precedes his or her evaluation of the tax consequences, is also admissible evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of a defendant in a criminal case may state an opinion or inference as to whether the defendant did or did not have the mental state or condition constituting an element of the crime charged or of a defense thereto.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an opinion as to the proper tax consequences of a transaction”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.