Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

790 F.2d 76

Docket No. 84-7093.

Washburn v. Rabun

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-05-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1986

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Washburn v. Rabun · 487 So. 2d 1361 - Washburn v. Rabun

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1986-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edmon L. Rinehart, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Andrew P. Campbell and Clark Watson, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and THORNBERRY*, Senior Circuit Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6This court certified to the Supreme Court of Alabama three questions determinative of whether, under Alabama law, the federal district court was correct in holding that Washburn’s complaint stated a cause of action against Rabun individually. Washburn v. Rabun, 755 F.2d 1404 (11th Cir.1985).

¶7The Alabama Supreme Court has answered all three questions in the negative. Washburn v. Rabun, 487 So.2d 1361 (Ala.1986) . The answers establish that the district court did not err in holding that Wash-bum did not state a cause of action.

¶8AFFIRMED.

/790/f2d/76 · .json · Public domain