Tomtom, Inc. v. Adolph’s Empirical Analysis
790 F.3d 1315 · 2015
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102
Relies on Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Loctite Corporation v. Ultraseal Ltd · Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co. · Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Raytek Corp. · Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. Medrad, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“necessary to give life, meaning, and vitality to the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only state[d] the intended use of the invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.