Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 F.3d 608 - Culbertson v. Lykos

Culbertson v. Lykos’s Empirical Analysis

790 F.3d 608 · 2015

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Kentucky v. Graham · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the law was not clearly established that a mere recommendation of termination to a higher authority who makes the final decision causes an adverse employment action”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “between Jett and the later decisions interpreting Beattie to hold that only final decision makers may be held liable for First Amendment retaliation under § 1983, the Culbertson court concluded: It can at least be said that before [the ADA] could be individually liable despite not being the final decision-maker, it must be shown that her recommendation was made in retaliation for constitutionally protected speech and was the reason the adverse employment decision was made by the final decision-maker. A”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[i]t was unsettled...whether someone who is not a final decision-maker and makes a recommendation that leads to the plaintiff being harmed can be liable for retaliation under Section 1983.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.