Podraza v. Whiting’s Empirical Analysis
790 F.3d 828 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit · Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc. · Florida State Board of Administration v. Green Tree Financial Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is insufficient by itself to give rise to a strong inference of scienter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“embracing [an] intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.