Winebrenner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Mitchell v. State · White v. State · Butler v. State · Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons,, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Probable cause adequate to support a warrantless arrest exists when, at the time of the arrest, the officer has knowledge of facts and cireum-stances that could warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that the suspect committed a criminal act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.