Farrell v. Littell’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carmichael v. Siegel · Stewart v. Stewart · Cansler v. Mills · Mariscal v. State · Louis v. Kenseth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would endanger [the child]'s physical health or well-being or significantly impair [the child]'s emotional development,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. D.B. v. M.B. · Walker v. Nelson“By its plain language, Indiana Code section 31-14-14-1 requires a court to make a specific finding of physical endangerment or emotional impairment prior to placing a restriction on the noncustodial parent's visitation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. D.B. v. M.B. · Walker v. Nelson“did not make a specific finding that [parenting time] would endanger [the child]'s physical health or well-being or significantly impair [the child]'s emotional development,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. D.B. v. M.B.V. · Jm v. Nm
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.