Munns v. Munns’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2016
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Copeland · Jones v. Jones · Brinkerhoff v. Forsyth · Maughan v. Maughan · Gardner v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[An unsuccessful appeal which is worthy of consideration is not an egregious case worthy of sanctions and, therefore, is not frivolous.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. N.F. v. G.F. · N.F. v. G.F.“misunderstanding or misapplication of the law resulting in substantial and prejudicial error ... [njor such a serious inequity ... as to manifest a clear abuse of discretion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must place a dollar value on the distributed assets”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Roberts · Taft v. Taft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.