Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 P.2d 578 - Whatcott v. Whatcott

Whatcott v. Whatcott’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
7
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc. · Myers v. McDonald · Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National Bank · Sampson v. Richins · CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We see nothing in the record which prevented him from filing suit within the statutory period even if he was not fully aware of the harm arising from the abuse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A grant of summary judgment is appropriate only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he summary judgment hearing was not included as part of the appellate court record.... `Therefore, we presume the trial judge acted correctly....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.