State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Thurman (1993), State v. Robinson (1990)
1 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Mendenhall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) There must be clear and positive testimony that the consent was “unequivocal and specific” and “freely and intelligently given”; (2) the government must prove consent was given without duress or coercion, express or implied; and (3) the courts indulge every reasonable presumption against the waiver of fundamental constitutional rights and there must be convincing evidence that such rights were waived.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Carter · State v. Sterger“[Wjhere a defendant fails to assert a particular ground for suppressing unlawfully obtained evidence in the trial court, an appellate court will not consider that ground on appeal. “[T]he failure to assert a particular ground in a pre-trial suppression motion operates as a waiver of the right to challenge the subsequent admission of evidence on that ground.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sims · State v. Belgard“solicited, requested, commanded, encouraged, or intentionally aided”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State Ex Rel. Vt · State v. V.T.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.