Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 P.2d 796 - People v. Williams

People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably Blauwkamp v. University of New Mexico Hospital (1992), Masters v. People (2002)

33 state decisions

1601990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25 · Harris v. McRae · Akers v. United States · Israel v. Futuronics Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “€œ[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a common sense inquiry: whether an untrained lay person would be qualified to determine a particular issue ‘intelligently and to the best possible degree without enlightenment from those having a specialized understanding of the subject involved in the dispute.’”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'This deference reflects the superior opportunity of the trial judge to gauge both the competence of the expert and the extent to which his opinion would be helpful to the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.