Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

790 So. 2d 1187

Pirant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-07-25

Relies on Pendarvis v. State

Decided 2001-07-25

SALCINES, Judge.

¶1Robert Pirant appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell and possession of cannabis. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. Therefore, we do not decide the merit of these issues. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

¶2Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
/790/so2d/1187 · .json · Public domain