Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 SO2D 1229 - Atria v. Hodor

Atria v. Hodor’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 480 So. 2d 625 - Johnson v. Davis · 656 So. 2d 917 - Stogniew v. McQueen · Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum · Holt v. Brown's Repair Service, Inc. · 727 So. 2d 296 - O'BRIEN v. Federal Trust Bank, FSB

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To be in privity with one who is a party to a lawsuit, one must have an interest in the action such that she will be bound by the final judgment as if she were a party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.