Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

790 So. 2d 447

Dolan v. Dolan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-09-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on 650 So. 2d 61 - Adkins v. Adkins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-09-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1On this appeal and cross-appeal of a final dissolution judgment, we conclude there is substantial and competent evidence to support all of the trial court’s findings and we therefore affirm the judgment in all respects. See Adkins v. Adkins, 650 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (stating that: “so long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, we are required to affirm the final judgment appealed from ... ”). As both parties properly concede, however, several scriveners errors and omissions appear on the face of the judgment which need to be corrected on remand, namely:

(1) That the appellant/father shall have alternate weekend visitation with the minor child from 6:00 p.m. Friday until 6:00 p.m. on Sunday evenings rather 6:00 p.m. on Monday as stated;
(2) that the judgment be amended to reflect that it was entered on February 17,1999;
(3) that the appellant provide a separate telephone line for the minor child to allow the child to communicate directly with the appellant; and
(4) that the judgment otherwise expressly incorporate by reference and ratify the parties’ agreement or stipulation as to shared parental responsibility.

¶2Affirmed but remanded with directions.

/790/so2d/447 · .json · Public domain