Paul v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 536 So. 2d 202 - Tingle v. State · 674 So. 2d 791 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim by stating that the victim was honest, that she heard nothing which would indicate that the victim had fabricated her statements, and that the victim would have no motive for lying”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russ v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.