Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 So. 2d 888 - Fleming v. State

790 So. 2d 888 - Fleming v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Barker v. Wingo · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether and how a defendant asserts his right is closely related to the other factors we have mentioned. The strength of his efforts will be affected by the length of the delay, to some extent by the reason for the delay, and most particularly by the personal prejudice, which is not always readily identifiable, that he experiences. The more serious the deprivation, the more likely a defendant is to complain. The defendant’s assertion of his speedy trial right, then, is entitled to strong evidentiary weight in determining whether the defendant is being deprived of the right. We emphasize that failure to assert the right will make it difficult for a defendant to prove that he was denied a speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.