Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 SW2D 276 - State v. Hartley

State v. Hartley’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of Madisonville · Hunt v. Hunt · Pass v. State · 3 Smith & H. 544 - Darnell v. Shapard · Smith County Education Ass'n v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Either party to a suit in chancery is entitled, upon application, to a jury to try and determine any material fact in dispute, save in cases involving complicated accounting, as to such accounting, and those elsewhere excepted by law or by provisions of this Code, and all the issues of fact in any proper cases shall be submitted to one (1) jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.