Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 790 SW2D 609 - Hass v. State

Hass v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Gish v. State · Wilson v. State · Tolentino v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is nothing shown in the affidavit to establish the inference and support the belief that marijuana was in the residence of the appellants.... Suspicion and conjecture do not constitute probable cause, and the facts as recited in the affidavit in this cause evidence nothing more than mere suspicion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... the facts submitted to the magistrate are sufficient to justify a conclusion that the property that is the object of the search probably is on the ... premises to be searched at the time the warrant issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.