Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 791 F.2d 1412 - Lindsey v. Department of Labor

Lindsey v. Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

791 F.2d 1412 · 1986

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
May 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably University Medical Center v. Sullivan (1992), Elliott v. Four Seasons Properties (1992)

10 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 41 U.S.C. § 352 · 41 U.S.C. § 354

Relies on Taylor v. Lake · Whitcomb Keller Mortgage Co Inc Data-Link Systems Inc v. Whitcomb & Keller Mortgage Co Inc · Data-Link System Inc. v. Whitcomb & Keller Mortgage Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not detract from the substance of the underlying agreement. In light of the clear, essentially undisputed, intent of the parties ..., the bankruptcy court approved an assumption of the contract. 27 Id. at 1415. 28 The trustee attempts to distinguish Harris by arguing that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “of the debtor's assumption. Id. at 1414-15. 26 [T]he bankruptcy court's approval of the stipulation is plausible only as an approval of ... assumption of the ... contract. That the stipulation was not formally labeled”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.