Wilson v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.2d 151 · 1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Oliveira v. United States (1987), Bingaman v. Department of the Treasury (1997)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 5596
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co. · Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Hoska v. United States Department of Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Administrative proceedings and appeals therefrom. No provision of the Civil Service Reform Act shall be applied by the Board in such a way as to affect any administrative proceeding pending at the effective date of such provision. "Pending” is considered to encompass existing proceedings and appeals before the Board or its predecessor agencies, that were subject to judicial review or under judicial review on January 11, 1979, the date on which the Act became effective. [Emphasis in text added.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No provision of this Act ... shall affect any administrative proceeding pending at the time such provisions take effect. Orders shall be issued in such proceedings, and appeals shall be taken therefrom, as if this Act had not been enacted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is clear ... that the notice of personnel action was an “administrative proceeding pending” on the effective date of the CSRA within the meaning of the Savings Provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.