Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 791 F.2d 341 - Youmans v. Simon

Youmans v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis

791 F.2d 341 · 1986

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States Riley v. St Luke's Episcopal Hospital O Md, Forsythe v. Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. (1989)

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

20019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Foman v. Davis · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Bell v. Hood · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the efforts made by those other than the investor are the undeniably significant ones, those essential managerial efforts which affect the failure or success of the enterprise.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) an agreement among the parties leaves so little power in the hands of the partner or venturer that the arrangement in fact distributes power as would a limited partnership; or (2) the partner or venturer is so inexperienced and unknowledgeable in business affairs that he is incapable of intelligently exercising his partnership or venture powers; or (3) the partner or venturer is so dependent on some unique entrepreneurial or managerial ability of the promoter or manager that he cannot replace the manager of the enterprise or otherwise exercise meaningful partnership or venture powers.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A party seeking to prove the contrary must bear a heavy burden of proof.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.