Knaubert v. Goldsmith’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.2d 722 · 1986
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Tinsley v. Borg (1990), Dyer v. Calderon (1998)
49 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Haines v. Kerner · Townsend v. Sain · Stone v. Powell · Sandstrom v. Montana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]ot every finding of fact need be stated on the record in infinite detail and clarity. In certain circumstances we will recognize that a factual determination is implicit in the actions taken by a state court.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Van Pilon v. Reed · Walton v. Zenon“[Fed.R.Civ.P.] 15[ (a) ]'s policy of favoring amendments to pleadings should be applied with extreme liberality.' " United States v. Webb, 655 F.2d 977 , 979 (9th Cir.1981) (quotations omitted). Moreover, "[t]he district court is required to construe a pro se petition more liberally than it would construe a petition drafted by counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o sort of factual finding ... is more appropriate for deferential treatment than is a state court's credibility determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.