Thomas v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.2d 730 · 1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 204 · 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Fuentes v. Shevin · Lynch v. Household Finance Corp. · Anderson Nat Bank v. Luckett · Powderly v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appellees were therefore not entitled to waiver under section 404(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Foo v. Tillerson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.