Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.2d 755 · 1986
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Lancaster Community Hospital v. Antelope Valley Hospital District (1991), Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield (1987)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Parker v. Brown · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · City of Lafayette Louisiana v. Louisiana Power & Light Company · Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[v]irtually any anti-competitive effect . . . would appear to be well within”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“state statutes need not require anti-competitive conduct for the exemption to apply when it is apparent that anticompetitive effects would result from a broad authority to regulate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“logically would result from [such] broad authority to regulate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.