Dial v. Coler’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.2d 78 · 1986
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2006
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Quern v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no retrospective or notice relief is available, . . . a federal program has been changed, and . . . new regulations have been promulgated thereunder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable assurance that the questioned conduct will not be resumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.