Jones v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.3d 1023 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Turner v. Safley · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Sherbert v. Verner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“RLUIPA does not authorize suits for damages against state officials in their individual capacities because individual state officials are not recipients of federal funding and nothing in the statute suggests any congressional intent to hold them individually liable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leahy v. Conant“'would chill or silence a person of ordinary firmness' from engaging in such protected activities in the future,” Jones, 791 F.3d. at 1036 (quoting Rhodes, 408 F.3d at 568-69 ); see also Rhodes, 408 F.3d at 567 n.11 (holding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Entler v. Gregoire“harm that is more than minimal will almost always have a chilling effect.”). 18 . The district court's reliance on Bradley in concluding that “peaceable operation of the prison through the insistence on respect”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Entler v. Gregoire
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.