Rock v. Levinski’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.3d 1215 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Garcetti v. Ceballos · Rankin v. McPherson · Waters v. Churchill · 134 S. Ct. 2369 - Lane v. Franks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the speech was made pursuant to an employee’s official duties; (2) whether the speech was on a matter of public concern; (3) whether the government’s interests, as employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public service are sufficient to outweigh the plaintiffs free speech interests; (4) whether the protected speech was a motivating factor in the adverse employment action; and (5) whether the defendant would have reached the same employment decision in the absence of the protected conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rejected a First Amendment retaliation claim because the employee had 'frustrated the ability of [the government agency] to control and fashion its own message.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klaassen v. Atkinson“it is well established that the First Amendment does not require a government employer to tolerate such disloyalty from the upper echelons of the administration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klaassen v. Atkinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.