Renaut v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
791 F.3d 163 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (§ 239 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. · Gomez-Palacios v. Holder · Romilus v. Ashcroft · Arrieta v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lopes v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“adopts portions of the IJ's findings while adding its own gloss,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we review both the IJ's and the BIA's decisions as a unit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Typically, we have found the absence of specific findings problematic in cases in which such a void hampers our ability meaningfully to review the issues raised on judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.