Scharff v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Jasany v. United States Postal Service · Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If [the Postal Service]'s assessment of [Partlow]'s limitation on lifting and carrying [is] substantially correct, [he] would be unable to perform approximately half of the jobs in the local economy[,] for he would be restricted to light or medium work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Partlow v. Runyon“the inquiry [of who is handicapped] is, of necessity, an individualized one whether a particular impairment constitutes a significant barrier to employment for a particular person”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Partlow v. Runyon“[t]he plaintiff would be precluded from performing a wide range of jobs if her ability to perform tasks was limited in the manner described by [the examining physician].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Partlow v. Runyon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.