Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 791 N.E.2d 266 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stephenson v. State · Cox v. State · Alspach v. State · Maul v. State · Berry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “simply means that the opinion must be one that a reasonable person could normally form from the perceived facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if the testimony gives substance to facts, which were difficult to articulate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Due to the amount of cocaine that Davis possessed compared to the amount a drug user would typically use, and the fact that the rocks were individually wrapped, we find that the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Davis' conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.