Bell v. Lollar’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc. · Philip Morris Inc. v. Harshbarger · Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc. · Freidline v. Shelby Insurance Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.