Wesely v. Flor’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center · Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. · Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota · Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester · Anderson v. Rengachary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the motion to dismiss the action identifies the claimed deficiencies in the affidavit or answers to interrogatories; (2) the time for hearing the motion is at least 45 days from the date of service of the motion; and (3) before the hearing on the motion, the plaintiff does not serve upon the defendant an amended affidavit or answers to interrogatories that correct the claimed deficiencies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wesely v. Flor“be signed by each expert listed in the affidavit and by the plaintiffs attorney and state the identity of each person whom plaintiff expects to call as an expert witness at trial to testify with respect to the issues of malpractice or causation, the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify, and a summary of the grounds for each opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wesely v. Flor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.