Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2002
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Miller v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · State Ex Rel. Henry v. Mahler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal and punishes such action. 2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3d. Every law that changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State“[No] ex post facto violation occurs if a change does not alter `substantial personal rights' but merely changes modes of procedure which do not affect matters of substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State“law may disadvantage the petitioner, for it reduces by half the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arnold v. Cody
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.