791 So. 2d 1062 - Marks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 529 So. 2d 1074 - Ross v. State · 419 So. 2d 610 - Lidge v. State · 419 So. 2d 616 - Ex Parte Lidge · 612 So. 2d 1317 - Ford v. State · 549 So. 2d 562 - James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"On return to remand, the circuit court has attached copies of the two indictments. The two indictments read as follows: "`[Pritchett] did, in the course of committing a theft of Four Hundred Sixty Three Dollars and Twenty-Two Cents of the lawful currency of the United States of America, a more particular description and denomination of which is to the grand jury otherwise unknown, the property of Paul Shrove, use force against the person of Paul Shrove, or against the person of another present, with intent to overcome his physical resistance or physical power of resistance, while the said [Pritchett] was armed with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, to wit: a shotgun, in violation of Section 13A-8-41 of the Alabama Criminal Code.'" "__________ "`[Pritchett] did, in the course of committing a theft of Four Hundred Fifty One Dollars of the lawful currency of the United States of America, a more particular description and denomination of which is to the grand jury otherwise unknown, the property of Robert Woods, threaten the imminent use of force against the person of Robert Woods, with the intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property, while the said [Pritchett] was armed with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, to wit: a sawed-off shotgun, in violation of Section 13A-8-41 of the Alabama Criminal Code.' "Thus, the indictments do not contain any factual allegations that Pritchett was aided in the commission of the robbery by another per”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.