Fudge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 406 So. 2d 1089 - Parker v. State · Armstrong v. State · 471 So. 2d 1353 - Bordeaux v. State · 416 So. 2d 875 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Link · 685 So. 2d 1290 - State v. Troutman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]isdemeanors cannot be scored as primary offenses at conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.