Acquaotta v. State

Richard ACQUAOTTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-08-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2006

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to refile a rule 3.800(a) motion raising his claim of entitlement to credit for time served, affirmatively stating where in the court file or jail records the information concerning his jail service can be found.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Petscher v. State

Relies on Nelson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Sophia Letts, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3 *1252 PER CURIAM.

¶4Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to file a rule 3.800(a) motion raising his claim of entitlement to credit for time served, affirmatively stating where in the court file or jail records the information concerning his jail service can be found. See Nelson v. State,760 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

¶5DELL, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.