Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

791 So. 2d 1255

Lavender v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-08-24

Relies on Lippett v. State · 767 So. 2d 637 - Westerheide v. State

Decided 2001-08-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm on the authority of Westerheide v. State, 767 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 786 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2001) and certify the same questions to be of great public importance:

1) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
2) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSES OF THE UNTIED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
3) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
4) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES OF THE UNTIED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?

¶2AFFIRMED; QUESTIONS CERTIFIED.

THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
/791/so2d/1255 · .json · Public domain