791 So. 2d 44 - Bowen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 722 So. 2d 177 - Donaldson v. State · 519 So. 2d 622 - Staten v. State · Easter v. State · 269 Cal. App. 2d 97 - People v. Duty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. A (felony alleged) was committed by (name of person committing felony). 2. After the (felony alleged) was committed, (defendant) [maintained] [assisted] [aided or attempted to aid] (name of person committing felony). 3. At that time, (defendant) knew that (name of person committing felony) had committed the (felony alleged). 4. (Defendant) did so with the intent that (name of person committing felony) avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or punishment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State · Bowen v. State“(1) the crime was committed by Carr; (2) Ms. Bowen knew Carr had committed the crime; (3) Ms. Bowen thereafter “maintained, assisted or gave any other aid” to Carr; (4) Ms. Bowen gave the aid with the intent that Carr avoid or escape arrest; and (5) Ms. Bowen was not related to Carr by blood or marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bowen v. State“must be consistent with the defendant's guilt and inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.