Carrel v. Carrel’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1672 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1673
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Herbert v. Harl · In Re Marriage of Vanet · Teefey v. Teefey · State Ex Rel. Stanhope v. Pratt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.