Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 791 SW2D 840 - State v. Merchant

State v. Merchant’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2010

12 state decisions

80199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schneider · State v. Giffin · State v. Evans · State v. Sloan · State v. Brookshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, the mere injection of the defense of mental disease or defect does not meet the burden of showing sudden passion. It is a distinct and wholly separate defense having no relevancy on the manslaughter issue. See [State v.] Hunter, supra, 755 S.W.2d [634] at 638 [ (Mo.App.1988) ].” State v. Merchant, 791 S.W.2d 840, 843 (Mo.App.1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court shall not be obligated to charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the included offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.